• Home
  • Blog
  • EWU The Case for Reason Science Humanism and Progress Discussion

EWU The Case for Reason Science Humanism and Progress Discussion

0 comments

Need help with my English question – I’m studying for my class.

1.Explain the difference between believing in each scientific statement and supporting the scientific way of thinking.  (CHAPTER-22)

2. Explain each question according to Pinker and then EXPRESS YOUR OPINION1. Can we sustain the trends towards progress? How reasonable is the hope for continuing progress? P.327, 344, 345.(CHAPTER- 20) Explain the quote from Isaiah Berlin; explain “A constructive agenda that reconciles long-term gains with short-term setbacks, historical currents with human agency”; Why is “optimism” a wrong word for the future of progress? Explain “I am not an optimist.  I am a very serious possibilist” (Hans Rosling)

3. Are humans rational or irrational? P.353-355.(CHAPTER 21) Explain Pinker’s examples of biased evaluation of data p.360-363(CHAPTER 21)

4. What is the major enemy of reason in the public sphere today? P.371-374(CHAPTER 21)

5.What can be done to improve standards of reasoning? P.375-381. What can be done to make public discourse more rational? P.381-384(CHAPTER 21)

6.What is humanism? P.410-412(CHAPTER 23). What are some fundamental (intrinsic) human rights — according Martha Nussbaum, according to Pinker, according to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights? P. 413-414.(CHAPTER 23)

7.Explain what Pinker means by “Humanism is the only viable moral philosophy for a cosmopolitan world” p.418-419.  Do you agree?  Why or why not?(CHAPTER 23)

About the Author

Follow me


{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}