ethics 211

0 comments

Requirements:

No outside resources – only the document that I will send you.

No plagiarism

Good grammar- complete thoughts

Deep response- Good arguments

Essay format- Introduction, body paragraphs, conclusion

Is a philosophy class so I need an excellent response.

200 words minimum for question .

  • How could Blackburn and McGinn – but not Thomson or Little – respond to the sorts of arguments proposed by Lee and George for the wrongness of abortion?
  • What is the relevance in the abortion debate of distinguishing human persons from human beings? Might there be non-human persons or human beings that are not persons?
  • The issue of free will/determinism is obviously too large to be dealt with quickly and glibly. Blackburn’s approach to it is to background the metaphysical question of whether people might do otherwise than they do (as opposed to their actions, and their decisions being a result of pre-existing causes not under their control) in favor of considering whether determinism, if true, would show “the futility of ethics”. His position, finally, is that even if human action is in some sense “determined”, that ethics nevertheless need not be futile. How is that supposed to work?

About the Author

Follow me


{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}