I just need you to answer the following questions
1) What was the biggest hurdle when it came to the Annotated Bibliography?
- How did you overcome that obstacle?
- What do you feel like you accomplished with the Annotated Bibliography?
2) What did you argue about in your Classical Argument?
- Why did you choose that topic?
- Did your perspective about the topic change at all?
- Why/why not?
3) What is the difference between the Classical Argument and the Rogerian Argument?
- What was the common ground between both sides?
- Did the common ground change the way you looked at the overall debate
- Did it have any effect on your solution?
4) What did you take away from the Toulmin Argument?
- What did categorizing do for you as a student?
- Do you feel like you examine arguments differently now?
- Why/Why not?
0 comments