Bidirectional effect on maternal restrictive feeding and eating in the absence of hunger (21, 27, 33 months) to see those patterns at different ages
Do you think this paper addresses a gap in the literature effectively? If so or if not, how?
What do you think of the research design (as shown in Figure 1)? What impact does the design have on the overall conclusion of the study?
How do you think the intervention approach the researchers took where they allowed the mothers to feed their children a normal meal (compared to standardized meals in previous research) impacts the study?
Were there other methods the authors used that were different than in previous research? How did they impact the study? Which one of those factors do you think was the most influential?
What do you think about how the researchers framed offering the child extra food after the meal? Would you have done anything differently?
Do you think the results were presented effectively? What do you like? What would you do differently?
What is the greatest source of bias in the data they presented? Explain.
What would be the next steps in research going forward? What studies would you design based on the findings here?
0 comments