Discussion week 5 MF

0 comments

The 34-Year-Old Patient Evaluation & Management Plan


A 34-y.o. female presents with the complaint of a sudden excruciating pain in her back and points to her flank area on the right side. She rates the pain as 10 on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the worst. She also complains of nausea with the pain. She states that she has never had anything like this before, and the pain is subsiding a little now.

  1. What additional questions should you ask the patient and why?
  2. What should be included in the physical examination at this visit?
  3. What are the possible differential diagnoses at this time?
  4. What tests should you order and why?
  5. How should this patient be managed?

Submission Instructions:

  • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources
  • Grading Rubric

    Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

    Discussion Rubric
    Criteria Ratings Points
    Identification of Main Issues, Problems, and Concepts Distinguished – 5 points
    Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues, problems, and concepts.
    Excellent – 4 points
    Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.
    Fair – 2 points
    Identifies and demonstrate an acceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.
    Poor – 1 point
    Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.
    5 points
    Use of Citations, Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines Distinguished – 3 points
    Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing. High level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.
    Excellent – 2 points
    Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. Moderate level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.
    Fair – 1 point
    Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.
    Poor – 0 points
    Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.
    3 points
    Response to Posts of Peers Distinguished – 2 points
    Student constructively responded to two other posts and either extended, expanded or provided a rebuttal to each.
    Fair – 1 point
    Student constructively responded to one other post and either extended, expanded or provided a rebuttal.
    Poor – 0 points
    Student provided no response to a peer’s post.
    2 points

About the Author

Follow me


{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}