TWO Page case analysis report, I will upload the case in the file.
*Please include a reference page if you cite sources. I will not count the reference page. Feel free to add your sources at the end of your report.
*Citing and including references does not mean you can copy and paste other’s sentences. Please rewrite them with your own words to avoid plagiarism. No tolerance for plagiarism. No grade for the analysis over 20% of plagiarism.
*You can be creative to fully use two pages. Table, bullet points, and plain sentences are all allowed.
*Please Include the question numbers. Don’t need to include the question sentences and your name.
Questions:
1. Suggest a business-level strategy for First Solar’s PV solar business and explain why. Answer with consideration of the source of competitive advantage and the scope of the target market.
2. Evaluate First Solar’s corporate-level strategy and provide a suggestion to increase the value of First Solar.
3. Suggest a competition or cooperation recommendation for First Solar and explain why.
Grading Criteria (total 15%):
Q1 (5%):
(5) Suggested a business-level strategy with consideration of the source of competitive advantage and the scope of the target market AND Provided convincing reasons for the suggestion using the analysis tools learned in the class and statistics and facts in the case.
(3) Did not consider the source of competitive advantage and the scope of the target market OR Did not provide convincing reasons for the suggestion using the analysis tools learned in the class and statistics and facts in the case.
(0) Did not answer this question.
Q2 (5%):
(5) Evaluated First Solar’s corporate-level strategy and Provided a clear suggestion to increase the value of First Solar AND Evaluations and suggestions are logical and convincing because those are based on the class materials and supporting evidence (case, statistics, or articles).
(3) Did not evaluate First-Solar’s corporate-level strategy OR Did not provide a clear suggestion to increase the value of First Solar OR Answers are not convincing because those are not based on the class materials nor supporting evidence (case, statistics, or articles).
(0) Did not answer this question.
Q3 (3%)
(3) Suggested a competition or cooperation recommendation AND Provided convincing reasons using the analysis tools learned in the class and statistics and facts in the case.
(2) Did not suggest a competition or cooperation recommendation OR Did not provide convincing reasons using the analysis tools learned in the class and statistics and facts in the case.
(0) Did not answer this question.
Length of the analysis (1%)
Submission of the analysis by the due (1%)
0 comments