The prompt is as follows:
“Consider this argument.
a. Having sex with someone, while lacking that person’s morally valid consent, is seriously
morally wrong.
b. Deceiving another person into having sex involves having sex with someone, while lacking
that person’s morally valid consent.
c. Therefore, deceiving someone into having sex is seriously morally wrong.
Either defend or attack the argument just stated, which is advanced by Tom Dougherty. Your
discussion should consider arguments advanced by Dougherty as well as counterarguments by
Hallie Liberto, and should consider some significant objections against both (a) and (b).”
Do not use sophisticated vocabulary but rather use conversational basic vocabulary. Attack the claim, do not defend, and explain every claim and term thoroughly. Below I attached my Professor’s expectations/ guidelines. I also attached two articles we were given from Tom Dougherty and one from Hallie Liberto. Attempt not to directly quote too often, but rather expand and include paraphrased ideas while using a footnote.
0 comments