• Home
  • Blog
  • Daguerrotypes vs. Calotypes (Photography comparison)

Daguerrotypes vs. Calotypes (Photography comparison)

0 comments

Requirements:

MLA Formatting

Cite any and all outside sources

One page minimum

Answer the following in full sentences and a cohesive short essay format (at least 1 paragraph for each numbered section)

Topic:

1. Describe the specific technological and material differences that distinguish a Daguerrotype from a Calotype.

    • Think about what was unique to each process and what made did each medium/process do “better” than the other. What were the specific draw-backs to each compared to the other?

2. Explain how the technological and material differences of a Daguerrotype vs. a Calotype influence their formal and stylistic appearances. To answer this question, select 1 example of a Daguerrotype and compare/contrast its formal and stylistic features against 1 example of a Calotype chosen from the list below:

DAGUERROTYPES:

CALOTYPES:

3. Discuss how the difference materials, processes, and formal appearance of Daguerrotypes vs. Calotypes relate to and reveal the larger debates that surrounded photography from its beginnings: namely, is photography a science or an art?

    • Think about if a Daguerrotype or a Calotype would be regarded as more/less scientific or more/less artistic. What kinds of expectations or standards are held by each of this disciplines: science vs. art? How do these early forms of photography play into these difference values and ideas?
    • Think about subject matter, too; what kinds of subjects and objects were captured in the Daguerrotype and Calotype that you chose to discuss? How is subject matter a meaning choice that also speaks to these larger debates surrounding photography?

About the Author

Follow me


{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}