Home
Blog
Community Health Problem & Improvement Plan

Community Health Problem & Improvement Plan

Daniel Kevins

0 comments

Read and watch the lecture resources & materials below early in the week to help you respond to the discussion questions and to complete your assignment(s).

Read

Mauer, F.A. & Smith, C. M. (2013).
- Chapters 15-17 & 22
  Community assessment tool applied to geopolitical and phenomenological communities.rtf Download Community assessment tool applied to geopolitical and phenomenological communities.rtf
  Textbook windshield study.rtf Download Textbook windshield study.rtf

Watch

National Center for Environmental Health (5:58)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2016, September 1). National center for environmental health (NCEH) [Video]. YouTube.
National Center for Environmental Health (NCEH) (Links to an external site.)

Briefly describe one community health problem from your community’s health improvement plan. What structure, process, and outcome standards would you use to evaluate a program addressing this problem?

Instructions:

Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources WITHIN THE LAST FIVE YEARS.

null

Grading Rubric

Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

Discussion Rubric
Criteria	Ratings	Points
Identification of Main Issues, Problems, and Concepts	Distinguished – 5 points Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues, problems, and concepts.	Excellent – 4 points Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.	Fair – 2 points Identifies and demonstrate an acceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.	Poor – 1 point Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.	5 points
Use of Citations, Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines	Distinguished – 3 points Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing. High level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.	Excellent – 2 points Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. Moderate level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.	Fair – 1 point Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.	Poor – 0 points Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.	3 points
Response to Posts of Peers	Distinguished – 2 points Student constructively responded to two other posts and either extended, expanded or provided a rebuttal to each.		Fair – 1 point Student constructively responded to one other post and either extended, expanded or provided a rebuttal.	Poor – 0 points Student provided no response to a peer’s post.	2 points
Total Points					10

About the Author

Daniel Kevins

Follow me