Your review will have 5 sections:
Documentation: how well was the code described, either as in-code comments or if there was separate documentation?
Extensibility: how well designed was the code for the extensions that you hope to make to it?
Design: what design patterns did the code use? Comment on whether you think they were good or poor choices,
and justify your comments.
Implementation: was the coding well done? What would you have done difffferently? What was good about the
implementation?
Style: comment on the style of the code. Were names, layout, code clich´es consistent?
If you have studied the code thoroughly the above points can easily
be made.
Marks will be removed for
I poor spelling, grammar and/or punctuation;
I bad organisation;
I unprofessional terminology such as “the previous guy was an
idiot” or “this is rubbish coding”;
I incorrect format submission (-1 mark penalty each time).


0 comments