Deadline 10/19/2014.
Need the homework in the tempalte form attached.
Below are the details of home work-
——————
Assignment 2: Case Study – Citibank Performance Evaluation
Due Week 4, Day 7 (180 points)
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
•
Explain why great people decisions are the most important factor for a manager’s career success.
•
Use technology and information resources to research issues in people management.
•
Write clearly and concisely about people management using proper writing mechanics.
Read the “Citibank: Performance Evaluation” case. Assume that you are Lisa Johnson. Write a 4-6 page
paper in which you:
1. Complete Exhibit One to evaluate James McGaran’s performance.
2. Describe the approach you would take in your performance feedback session with James. What
would you say, in what sequence would you say it, and what information would you reference to
back up what you are saying?
3. Assume that as a result of your extraordinary performance in this course, Citibank California has
employed you as a consultant to improve its performance evaluation system. Discuss what
changes in their processes and procedures you would recommend.
Your assignment should adhere to these guidelines:
•
Write in a logical, well-organized conventional business style. Use Times New Roman font size
12 or similar, double space, and leave ample white space per page.
•
All references must follow JWMI style guide and works cited must be cited appropriately. Check
with your professor for any additional instructions on citations.
•
On the first page or in a header, include the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the
professor’s name, the course title, and the date. Reference pages are not included in the
assignment page length.
•
Faculty have discretion to penalize for assignments over or under the assignment guidelines.
Check with your individual professor if you feel the assignment requires a much longer or shorter
treatment than recommended.
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and
language and writing skills, using the following rubric.
JWI 520: People Management
Academic Submissions and Evaluations
©2013 Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary information and may
not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.
This course guide is subject to change based on the needs of the class.
520 – Course Guide – Fall 2014
Page 17 of 26
Points: 180 Assignment 2: Case Study – Citibank Performance Evaluation
Criteria
Unacceptable
0-69% F
Fair
70-79% C
Proficient
80-89% B
Exemplary
90-100% A
1. Complete Exhibit One
to evaluate James
McGaran’s performance.
Weight: 30%
Did not submit or
incompletely
completed Exhibit
One to evaluate
James McGaran’s
performance.
Partially completed
Exhibit One to
evaluate James
McGaran’s
performance.
Satisfactorily
completed Exhibit
One to evaluate
James McGaran’s
performance.
Thoroughly
completed Exhibit
One to evaluate
James McGaran’s
performance.
2. Describe the approach
you would take in your
performance feedback
session with James.
Weight: 30%
Did not submit or
incompletely
described the
approach you would
take in your
performance
feedback session
with James.
Partially described
the approach you
would take in your
performance
feedback session
with James.
Satisfactorily
described the
approach you would
take in your
performance
feedback session
with James.
Thoroughly
described the
approach you would
take in your
performance
feedback session
with James.
3. Discuss what changes
in their processes and
procedures you would
recommend.
Weight: 30%
Did not submit or
incompletely
discussed what
changes in their
processes and
procedures you
would recommend.
Partially discussed
what changes in
their processes and
procedures you
would recommend.
Satisfactorily
discussed what
changes in their
processes and
procedures you
would recommend.
Thoroughly
discussed what
changes in their
processes and
procedures you
would recommend.
4. Clarity, writing
mechanics, and
formatting requirements
Weight: 10%
Multiple mechanics
errors or much of
the text is difficult to
understand and
fails to follow
formatting
instructions. The
text does not flow.
Several mechanics
errors make parts of
the text difficult for
the reader to
understand, the text
does not flow or the
discussion fails to
justify conclusions
and assertions.
More than a few
mechanics errors or
text flows but lacks
conciseness or
clarity; assertions
and conclusions are
generally justified
and explained.
Few mechanics
errors, text flows
and concisely and
clearly expresses
the student’s
position in a
manner that
rationally and
logically develops
the topics.
——————
0 comments