write for one and half .
Here what I want you use in my paper and I want you write this in my perer step by step :
1- Issue
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
2.Rule
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
3- Analysis
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
4-Conclusion
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
5- What you learned
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6-Content and Quality Connections
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Here the explain about that i need in that paper .
This will be the rubric used to evaluate your case submissions with the one exception that is noted in the Module 5.
IRAC Grading Rubric
|
IRAC/Case Analysis Rubric
|
|
Criteria
|
Ratings
|
Pts
|
|
|
Issue
view longer description
|
|
Clearly identifies the relevant issue of the case
5 pts
|
Identifies the issue but is not a clear and concise statement
4 pts
|
Can see an issue but does not properly address it
3 pts
|
Having difficulty concentrating on the issue.
2 pts
|
Does not understand the issue
1 pts
|
No Marks
0 pts
|
|
pts
|
Delete Criterion Link
|
|
Rule
view longer description
|
|
Concisely states the rule
5 pts
|
Mostly states the rule
4 pts
|
Partially states the rule
3 pts
|
Vaguely states the rule
2 pts
|
Does not state the correct rule
1 pts
|
No Marks
0 pts
|
|
pts
|
Delete Criterion Link
|
|
Analysis
view longer description
|
|
Clearly shows an understanding how the law applies to the facts.
5 pts
|
States how the facts and the law relate
4 pts
|
Does not clearly state how the facts and law relate
3 pts
|
Does not connect the facts or the law
2 pts
|
Unable to apply the law to the facts
1 pts
|
No Marks
0 pts
|
|
pts
|
Delete Criterion Link
|
|
Conclusion
view longer description
|
|
Clearly and Concisely states the conclusion
5 pts
|
States a good conclusion
4 pts
|
States a conclusion that is not concise but still on point
3 pts
|
States a conclusion
2 pts
|
Does not state a conclusion
1 pts
|
No Marks
0 pts
|
|
pts
|
Delete Criterion Link
|
|
What you learned
view longer description
|
|
Clearly states what the case taught you
5 pts
|
States what the case is about (paraphrases case)
4 pts
|
States the case verbatim or interjected personal feelings into the response
3 pts
|
States ideas not connected to the case
2 pts
|
Did not understand the case.
1 pts
|
No Marks
0 pts
|
|
pts
|
Delete Criterion Link
|
|
Content and Quality Connections
view longer description
|
|
Response is thoughtful, contains substantive insight and analysis in relation to topic. makes strong connections to readings, lecture, experience, workplace
5 pts
|
Response(s) demonstrate significant understanding. Robust insight and analysis. Evidence of connections.
4 pts
|
Content response is accurate but superficial. Some responses may be off topic. Acknowledges connections exist.
3 pts
|
Lacks depth; responses too general, conclusory, simplistic in nature. Some aspects of response are off topic. Posts lack connections.
2 pts
|
Interjected emotional responses, personal feelings, and /or beliefs in analysis
1 pts
|
No Marks
0 pts
|
|
pts
|
Delete Criterion Link
|
|
Total Points: 30
|
0 comments