Business Law Question

0 comments

Learning Goals

undefined

  • Reflect on “real life” legal procedures
  • Practice critical thinking skills
  • Practice writing skils
  • we are doing Option B. U.S. Supreme Court
    Oral Argument You must listen to 60 minutes of one
    of the following actual oral arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court, available
    on Oyez.org. These are real-time recordings
    of the actual arguments before the Supreme Court, so this is your best
    opportunity to understand how an argument before the Supreme Court works, short
    of visiting the Court in Washington D.C. yourself (which I highly recommend).
    ·
    Bostock v. Clayton
    County
    (2020) (sexual orientation discrimination under Title VII), available
    here (click on “Oral Argument”
    in the vertical blue banner on the left)
    ·
    U.S. Patent &
    Trademark Office v. Booking.com
    (2020) (whether the addition by an online
    business of a generic top-level domain (“.com”) to an otherwise generic term
    can create a protectable trademark), available here (click on “Oral Argument”
    in the vertical blue banner on the left)
    ·
    Little Sisters of the
    Poor v. Pennsylvania
    (2020) (religious exceptions to Affordable Care Act
    requirements that employers cover contraceptives in health care plans), available
    here(click on “Oral
    Argument” in the vertical blue banner on the left)
    ·
    Espinoza v. Montana
    Dept. of Revenue
    (religious discrimination in state-sponsored scholarship
    program in Montana) (2020), available here (click on “Oral
    Argument” in the vertical blue banner on the left)
    2. Write a
    Reflection Memo
    After attending a proceeding or listening to an oral argument,
    please write a short memo answering the following questions: Option B:
    U.S. Supreme Court Oral Argument
    1.
    What case did you listen to?
    2.
    Briefly describe the issue(s)
    before the Court – one paragraph is enough.
    3.
    What three things surprised you? Why
    did these things surprise you? E.g., did you have a preconceived notion that
    turned out to be wrong? Why do you think
    these things occurred?
    4.
    Has listening to this oral
    argument affected your attitude toward plaintiffs or defendants, attorneys, justices,
    or our legal system? Please explain.
    → Be
    sure to include an introductory paragraph that previews your key points in the
    paper, and a conclusion pulling it all together.
    Memo Requirements
    ·
    1-2 single-spaced pages (definitely
    not more than 2 pages please!)
    ·
    Typed, 11-12-point font
    ·
    1” margins
    ·
    Include both introduction and conclusion
    paragraphs, and make sure you have a strong topic sentence for each paragraph.
    ·
    Submit to D2L Assignments folder by
    11:59 pm on Sunday, March 28. I will gladly accept papers early!
    → Keep in mind that D2L will automatically check
    your paper against all papers in the Turnitin database, including other
    students’ papers and everything available on the web. Therefore, please make
    sure that the paper you submit is indeed your own work.

About the Author

Follow me


{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}