Business Law Question

0 comments

Choose five themes to explore. Using the class materials (including readings, videos, exercises and class discussions and presentations), analyze each of the five themes. Apply those concepts to the negotiation exercises, historical events, or your own life experiences. Another way to think about it is to consider what you would tell a friend about what you learned in the class. If you had to limit it to five things, what would they be? You don’t need to write it as a single paper (with a single introduction, for example); instead, it’s a collection of five reflections.

There is no page limit. Use APA rules on referencing. Include a list of references.

The grading rubrics are:

Problem: Briefly and adequately explained the events being analyzed.

Integration: Integrated course materials (Lectures, discussion, text, videos, exercise) as appropriate to develop a reasoned analysis

Analysis: Demonstrated intellectual depth and mastery of course topics

Writing: Lucid writing. Clear, correct English. Well-edited. Correct use of APA.

Begin this and every other paper with the following statement: “I verify that this paper is entirely my own work, with the exception of sources that have been properly cited.” Then “sign” the sentence (your typed name is fine).

The grading scale is the 4.0 system listed in the university catalog and in the syllabus, p. 2. Canvas generates a variety of percentages most of which are, for us, irrelevant. I can’t stop it from generating the percentages but you can ignore it.

Paper 2 Rubric

Criteria Ratings

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Problems Problem: Briefly and adequately explained the five themes being analyzed, supported by research and examples.

Outstanding

Strong

Good

Average

Missing/inadequate

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Integration Integrated course materials (Lectures, discussion, texts, videos, exercises) as appropriate to develop a reasoned analysis

Outstanding

Strong

Good

Average

Missing/inadequate

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Analysis Demonstrated intellectual depth and mastery of course topics

Outstanding

Strong

Good

Average

Missing/inadequate

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing Lucid writing. Clear, correct English. Well-edited. Correct use of APA

Outstanding

Strong

Good

Average

Missing/inadequate

Class contexts (text, podcasts, videos) would be added shortly to be used as a reference instead of any EXTERNAL REFRENCES/RESOURCES.

About the Author

Follow me


{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}