- Write a five (5) page literature review paper on the standing knowledge of the chosen question.
- Include a minimum of
five (5) journal articles, at least three (3) from nursing journals.
However, make sure that the (5) journals are the one’s analyzed and
synthesized in the results and discussion sections. - The body of the paper
should be made of the following titled sections: Title (introduction),
Methods, Results, Discussion, and Conclusion. - Provide a specific and
concise tentative title for your literature review paper (You may use
the results or at least the variables in the title). - Abstract is not required
- Include a 1-page
introduction of your topic (background information), the focus/aim of
your review. The introduction should include a statement of the problem,
briefly explain the significance of your topic study, and act to
introduce the reader to your definitions and background. Must include
your main statement (i.e. the purpose of this review is…{PICO
Question}). - The method section
should include sources, databases, keywords, inclusion/exclusion
criteria, and other information that establish credibility to your
paper. - The results should
summarize the findings of studies that have been conducted on your
topic. For each study you should briefly explain its purpose, procedure
for data collection and major findings. This is the section where you
will discuss the strengths and weaknesses of studies. - The discussion should
be like a conclusion portion of an essay paper. It serves as a summary
of the body of your literature review and should highlight the most
important findings. Your analysis should help you to draw conclusions.
In this section you would discussion any consensus or disagreement on
the topic. It can also include any strengths and weaknesses in general
of the research area. If you believe there is more to research, you may
include that here. - Finally, you will need
to conclude your paper. At this point you have put substantial effort
into your paper. Close this chapter with a summary of the paper, major
findings and any major recommendation for the profession. - In general, your paper
should show a sense of direction and contain a definite central idea
supported with evidence.
References
undefined
De Caterina, R. (2017). Aspirin in heart failure: don’t throw the baby (aspirin) out with the bathwater. European Journal of Heart Failure, 19(9), 1089–1094. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.894
undefined
Kılıç, S., Çelik, A., Çekirdekçi, E., Altay, S., Elçik, D., Akboğa, M. K., Durukan, M., Yayla, Ç., & Zoghi, M. (2019). The Prevalence and Risks of Inappropriate Combination of Aspirin and Warfarin in Clinical Practice: Results From WARFARIN-TR Study. Balkan Medical Journal, 36(1), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.4274/balkanmedj.2017.1472
undefined
Magnani, G., Giugliano, R. P., Ruff, C. T., Murphy, S. A., Nordio, F., Metra, M., Moccetti, T., Mitrovic, V., Shi, M., Mercuri, M., Antman, E. M., & Braunwald, E. (2016). Efficacy and safety of edoxaban compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure: insights from ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48. European Journal of Heart Failure, 18(9), 1153–1161. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.595
undefined
Khalil, C. A., Omar, O. M., Al Suwaidi, J., & Taheri, S. (2018). Aspirin use and cardiovascular outcome in patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus and heart failure: A population-based cohort study. Pulse International, 19(22), 17.
undefined
Beton, O., Asarcikli, L. D., Sen, T., Ipek, E. G., Kafes, H., Yaman, M., & Efe, T. H. (2017). Right Ventricular Dysfunction Complicates Time in Therapeutic Range in Heart Failure Patients Receiving Warfarin. Pharmacology, 99(1–2), 19. https://doi.org/10.1159/000449389
0 comments