I need help to critique this article edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4365&context=tqr”>https://nsuworks.nova.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4365&context=tqr please
please use these questions to guide you
1. What research question (s) did the researcher(s) seek to address?
2. Why was this important (if at all)?
3. What qualitative method/s of data collection did the researcher(s) employ? Do these methods fit with the a priori research questions?
4. What role did the researcher(s) play? What were the researchers’ positionality? axiological stance??
5. How did the researcher(s) select who to talk to, what to observe, etc?
6. Evaluate the quality of any of the interview guides or coding sheets presented. (if any).
7. What type of data analysis did the researcher(s) employ? Make sure to include post structural tenets.
8. How did the researcher(s) present the data (i.e., connected discourse, tables, quotes, maps, data instruments)? Was it clear from what source(s) the researchers acquired the data?? Was the method of presentation (i.e.,, the academic writing) effective? Why or why not?
9. Did the author directly or indirectly address any of the elements of Reflexivity? Axiological stance? Positionality? What ones? In what ways?
10. Did the author directly or indirectly address any of the elements of verisimilitude (i.e., truthfulness)? In what way?
11. Did the authors address ethical considerations? In what way?
12. What were the strengths of the research?
13. What were the limitations of the research as stated by the researcher(s) an/or by you?
14. How well did the conclusions match/connect to the data presented and the theoretical tenets??
15. If multiple methods were used, how well did the researcher integrate these aspects?
16. Did the researchers discuss the theoretical tenets in terms of the discoveries and conclusions?
17. What are the overall merits of the study?
18. If you had conducted the study, what would you have done differently, if anything?
0 comments