| Instructions | |
| Compliance is a comprehensive program that helps institutions and their employees conduct operations and activities ethically; with the highest level of integrity, and in compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. To have an effective compliance program, an organization must establish and maintain an organizational culture that “encourages ethical conduct and a commitment to compliance with the law.” U.S. Federal Sentencing Guidelines §8B2.1(a)(2). Using the OIG website (https://oig.hhs.gov/) or another of your choosing, select a real-time healthcare fraud news report from your local area to feature within your paper to educate the organization on the various case(s), the importance of healthcare finance compliance practices and the potential criminal and monetary fines that can be imposed on the individual and/or organization from the case. Develop a 3-5 page white paper that provides a succinct overview of the healthcare finance fraud committed including the details specified at the end of the course syllabus.Assignment 4, Fraud Case White Paper. Due NLT 11:59 p.m., Tuesday, Week 8. | |
| Due Date | |
Rubric Name: Grading Rubric
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.Criteria90-100%80-89%70-79%0-69%Criterion ScoreUnderstanding of Issue 20%20 points
The work demonstrates clear understanding of the subject, including its:
(1) history and evolution, (2) internal and external contributing factors, (3) participants and stakeholders, and (4) significance.17.8 points
The work demonstrates significant understanding of the subject, including its:
(1) history and evolution, (2) internal and external contributing factors, (3) participants and stakeholders, and (4) significance.15.8 points
The work demonstrates minimal understanding of the subject, including its:
(1) history and evolution, (2) internal and external contributing factors, (3) participants and stakeholders, and (4) significance.5 points
The work demonstrates little or no understanding of the subject, including its:
(1) history and evolution, (2) internal and external contributing factors, (3) participants and stakeholders, and (4) significance./ 20Clarity of Presentation (Logic, References) 25%25 points
The work demonstrates sound and compelling logic in incorporating relevant research in terms of (1) applicability, (2) sufficiency (i.e. more than one source), and (3) currency.
The document is well organized, straightforward, easy to understand, and leads the reader to an informed conclusion.22.25 points
The work demonstrates adequate logic in incorporating relevant research in terms of (1) applicability, (2) sufficiency (i.e. more than one source), and (3) currency.
The document is generally well organized, straightforward and somewhat easy to understand, but includes extraneous information or questionable findings as it leads the reader to a conclusion.19.75 points
The work demonstrates questionable logic, relies on literature that is dated or somewhat irrelevant in terms of (1) applicability, (2) sufficiency, or (3) currency.
The document is somewhat disjointed, not easy to understand, and the conclusion is difficult to discern.0 points
The work employs faulty logic, relying on research that is (1) not applicable, (2) too limited to support the analysis, or (3) not current.
The document is poorly organized, difficult to understand, or fails to reach a cogent conclusion.
0 comments