APa Format, No Plagiarism

0 comments

WEEKTOPICAL OUTLINEACTIVITIES AND ASSIGNMENTSWeek 2Evolution and Evaluation of Nursing Theories Conceptual influences Preparadigm stage Evidence-based practice related to theory Theory development and analysisReadings: Smith: Chapters 4, 5, and 6Week 2 ContentGo to Modules on the Course Menu, click, and scroll down to Week 2 content)Journal Article(s):Greenway, K., Butt, G., & Walthall, H. (2019). What is a theory-gap? An exploration of the concept. Nurse Education in Practice, 34, 1-6.Liehr, P. & Smith, M. J. (2017). Middle range theory: A perspective on development and use. Advances in Nursing Science. 40(1). 51-53.Nilson, P. (2015, April 21). Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implementation Science, 10(53). Online Class Activity (5 points): The early conceptualizations of nursing by Weidenbach, Henderson, and Hall (Chapters 4, 5, and 6) give a unique twist to the evolution of nursing theory. Students will be assigned one of the above theorists. The initial post should focus on the assigned theorist. Post the response to an unassigned theorist. Locate one media clip or weblink related to the assigned theorist that helps understand how the theory was implemented in practice to improve outcomesDescribe one (1) concept from the assigned theory that changed the evolution of: Theory and Research Activities and Assignments5.2.19: 2/3/2020LS 9.10.2020 DS nursing theory and research in the 21 first century


Group 3: Week 2 Online Activity – Hall

The early conceptualizations of nursing by Weidenbach, Henderson, and Hall (Chapters 4, 5, and 6) give a unique twist to the evolution of nursing theory.

For the initial post students will be assigned one theorist. Post the response to an unassigned theorist.

Group 3:

  • Locate one media clip or weblink related to one of the theorists that helps understand how the theory was implemented in practice to improve outcomes
  • Describe one (1) concept from the assigned theory that changed the evolution of nursing theory and research in the 21 first century

Graduate Online Class Activities Grading Rubric-5 points

Graduate Online Class Activities Grading Rubric-5 points

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInitial Post

2.0 pts

Proficient

The initial posting is substantive demonstrating critical thinking and thoughts delving deeper into the discussion topic and course content and includes a minimum of one professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal.

1.0 pts

Competent

The initial posting is somewhat substantive and/or includes one reference from a professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal and/or completed by Friday at 11:59 PM/EST.

0.5 pts

Novice

The initial posting is not substantive or submitted after Friday at 11:59 PM/EST. The initial post does not include a reference from a professional peer-reviewed scholarly. Posted on same day as response post.

2.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResponse

2.0 pts

Proficient

The response is a substantive interaction that builds on the ideas of others, delving deeper into the discussion question and course content in response to a colleague. The response includes one reference from a professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal.

1.0 pts

Competent

The response is somewhat substantive and includes one reference from a professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal.

0.0 pts

Novice

The response does not have a reference from professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal and/or did not post and/or posted on same day as initial posting.

2.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity/APA

1.0 pts

Proficient

Posting and responses are clear, concise, and in proper APA format for citations and references. No grammatical errors are noted. The entry adds worth to the dialogue and the comments build on the previous statements of others.

0.5 pts

Competent

Posting and responses are somewhat clear. Proper APA format for citation and reference noted in some areas but some APA infractions are apparent. Minor grammatical errors are noted. The entry adds to the dialogue, but some repetition and/or unclear thought is noted.

0.0 pts

Novice

Posting and responses are unclear. APA format not followed. Grammatical errors are noted. The entry does not build on previous dialogue.

1.0 pts

Total Points: 5.0



About the Author

Follow me


{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}