• Home
  • Blog
  • ACT 480 CSU Global The Practical Application of Accounting XBRL Capstone

ACT 480 CSU Global The Practical Application of Accounting XBRL Capstone

Daniel Kevins

0 comments

I need all workpaper, word document, & presentation slides done by 2pm MST on Wednesday the 5th.

Please review all required documents and make sure you have everything needed ASAP as professor already expects that I have everything needed to complete this assignment.

APA 7 is required for all sources used and cited.

Please note 5 – 6 credible sources need to be noted on reference page as well as cited.

Please draft detailed speaking notes for slides and cite all sources there as I will be reading this off when I record actual presentation via Zoom.

Please review all attached details for Lab instruction, as well as grading rubric and requirements noted.

Option #2: Financial Analytics: Financial Statement Analysis

You are required to complete both parts A and B.

Part A:

Complete Lab 8-3 Analyze Financial Statement Ratios (pp. 352 – 354) in your textbook.

Part B:

  1. Your analysis should be written as an essay and should include the following:
  • Introduction
  • Analysis: Headings – Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4 (i.e., Part 1: Identify the Questions) – headings are shown in the Lab.
  • Global Implications – Note any relevant ethical and regulatory trends affecting domestic and international accounting in the global business environment.
  • Conclusion.
  1. Submit your analysis as a Word document and submit any additional requirements noted in the Lab (i.e., Excel files, tables, etc.).
  2. Present your findings to the Board of Directors. Using Zoom, create and record a presentation of your analysis (4 slides).

Your paper should be 4-6 pages in length (excluding cover and references pages and Lab requirements) and conform to the guidelines in the CSU Global Writing Center (Links to an external site.). Include your four-slide presentation. Include at least five scholarly references in addition to the course textbook (six total minimum sources). The CSU Global Library (Links to an external site.) is a good place to find these references.

Rubric

ACT 480 Mod 8 PP

ACT 480 Mod 8 PP
Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements
70 to >56.0 pts

Meets Expectation

The Portfolio includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

 56 to >42.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

The Portfolio includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

 42 to >28.0 pts

Below Expectation

The Portfolio includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

 28 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

The Portfolio includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

70 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
55 to >44.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of XXX; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.

 44 to >33.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

 33 to >22.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

 22 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

55 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis
50 to >40.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.

 40 to >30.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

 30 to >20.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

 20 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.

50 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynthesis and Evaluation
50 to >40.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate synthesis and evaluation of course concepts in Research and Business Intelligence.

 40 to >30.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.

 30 to >20.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.

 20 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate synthesis and evaluation.

50 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources
20 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Cites and integrates five to six credible sources.

 16 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Cites and integrates three to four credible sources.

 12 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Cites and integrates one to two credible sources.

 8 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Cites and integrates no credible sources.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication of Source Material
20 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Sources well or adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue; knowledge from the course linked properly to source material.

 16 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major problems with selection and linkage of sources.

 12 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major problems with selection and linkage of sources.

 8 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Source selection is seriously flawed; no linkage to knowledge from the course.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization
20 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format, including an introduction, body, and conclusion. Conforms to project requirements.

 16 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Small number of significant but not major flaws in organization and writing; follows proper format. In a minor way does not conform to project requirements.

 12 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major problems in organization and writing; does not completely follow proper format. In a significant way does not conform to project requirements.

 8 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Project is not well organized or well written and does not follow proper format. Does not conform to project requirements.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar and Style
20 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few or no minor errors in grammar and spelling; appropriate writing style; clear and concise with no unsupported comments.

 16 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Small number of significant but not major errors in grammar and spelling; generally appropriate writing.

 12 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; work needed on grammar and spelling; does not meet program expectations.

 8 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Poor quality; unacceptable in terms of grammar and/or spelling; inappropriate writing style that interferes with clarity.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style.
20 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU Global resources on APA citation style, with no more than one significant error.

 16 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global resources on APA citation style, with no more than two to three significant errors.

 12 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global resources on APA citation style, with four to five significant errors.

 8 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global resources on APA citation style, with more than five significant errors.

20 pts

Total Points: 325

Previous

Author Image

About the Author

Daniel Kevins

Follow me

{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}