2 Leadership style

0 comments

Select one option 1 or 2:

Option #1: Leadership Style

Self-assessments enable you to learn more about yourself. These instruments feature behavioral questionnaires that address a variety of personal attributes, such as personality, emotional intelligence, communication abilities, motivation, and decision making. The overall expectation is that these instruments will provide you with value-added results, which will help you to hone your skills as a solid decision maker and leader.

Using the links to the self assessments in the lecture, or self assessments you find online, take at least one emotional intelligence assessment, one decision-making assessment, and one leadership assessment.

  • Discuss the outcomes of the assessments in a paper by specifically addressing:
    • Your individual personality
    • How your personality fits into the organization to which you currently belong
    • Your decision-making style
    • How your personality, EQ, and decision-making style impact your organizational contributions and leadership
  • Answer the following questions:
    • Are you effective in your role within your organization or elsewhere (identify the role)?
    • What common biases might impact your decision making?
    • What could you do to be a more effective decision maker?
    • How does all of the information that you have gathered from these assessments and your analysis reflect on you as a leader?

Assignment Requirements:

  • Your paper should be 4-5 pages in length, not counting the required title and references pages.
  • Format your paper according to the CSU Global Writing Center (Links to an external site.) .
  • Cite a minimum of six scholarly sources to support your positions, claims, and observations, in addition to the textbook, four of which should be academic, peer-reviewed sources. (You may not use the required and recommended readings for this course.)

Be sure to review the Critical Thinking Assignment rubric for details regarding grading standards.

Option #2: Impact of Emotions on Decision Making

This module focuses on the impact that emotional intelligence has on decision making. Additionally, the module highlights biases in decision making, as well as emotional influences on decision making.

Your goal for this assignment is to develop a plan to increase motivation, satisfaction, and performance in the workplace through the use of foundational principles associated with emotional intelligence. You must highlight the key elements of emotional intelligence that increase follower motivation and performance. Also, describe the potential biases that could impact leadership decision making and make recommendations to overcome the leadership biases. There are links to self assessments in the lecture that may provide food for thought as you develop your plan. Address the following in your paper/plan:

  • Provide a brief summary of the attributes associated with EQ.
  • Describe how you would embody each of those attributes.
  • Develop a means for employing the plan to increase motivation, satisfaction, and performance in the workplace.
  • Share specifics on the potential advantages and disadvantages of your plan.

Assignment Requirements:

  • Your paper should be 4-5 pages in length, not counting the required title and references pages.
  • Format your paper according to the CSU Global Writing Center (Links to an external site.) .
  • Cite a minimum of six scholarly sources to support your positions, claims, and observations, in addition to the textbook, four of which should be academic, peer-reviewed sources. (You may not use the required and recommended readings for this course.)

Be sure to review the Critical Thinking Assignment rubric for details regarding grading standards.

Rubric

ORG525 Mod 2 CT

ORG525 Mod 2 CT

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements

10 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

The paper or PowerPoint includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

8 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

The paper or PowerPoint includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

6 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

The paper or PowerPoint includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

4 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

The paper or PowerPoint includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

20 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources reference key concepts from the module with in-text citations to support answers.

16 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

12 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

8 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis

15 to >12.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.

12 to >9.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

9 to >6.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

6 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources / Examples

10 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the case study.

8 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria but are less‐than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the case study.

6 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria and are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the case study.

4 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.

10 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.

8 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.

6 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.

4 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style.

10 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with no more than one significant error.

8 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with no more than two to three significant errors.

6 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with four to five significant errors.

4 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with more than five significant errors.

10 pts

Total Points: 75

PreviousNext

About the Author

Follow me


{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}